Explain The Method Of Agreement

“Method of agreement.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/method%20of%20agreement. Access 30 Nov 2020. The common method deals with both the method of agreement and the method of difference as indicated by the diagram above. The application of the common method should therefore tell us that this time it is beef that is the cause. Knowledge expands when we can verify or distort a hypothesis. This is because experimental tests are designed in such a way that the hypothesis is probably a general explanation of certain facts and not an isolated case. This type of experiment is controlled, which means that the experimental structures differ only from one variable (see the miles of difference method). The experimental group is the one that recovers the variable, while the control group does not. What prompted you to look for the method of agreement? Please tell us where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible). Mills` rule of understanding states that if, in all cases where an effect occurs, there is a single prior C factor common to all of these cases, then C is the cause of the effect.

According to the table in this example, the only thing you ate was oysters. Therefore, if we apply the rule of concordance, we conclude that the consumption of oysters is the cause of the disease. The method of accompanying variation says that if, in a number of situations that lead to a particular effect, we find some ownership of the effect that varies with variation in a factor common to these situations, then we can infer that factor as a cause. It is important to remember that the use of the scientific method attempts to confirm or disprove a hypothesis; However, this process must always be considered partial and temporary. The weight we give to a confirmation or rebuttal is never all or nothing. We need to gather evidence over a long period of time. If we make mistakes, they are revealed by the results of repeated experiments. Unlike the four previous inductive methods, the method of accompanying variation does not involve the elimination of any circumstances. The change in size of one factor causes another factor to change in size. For a property to be a necessary condition, it must always be present when the effect is present. Since this is the case, we are interested in examining cases where the effect is present and to learning about the characteristics that exist and are absent under the “possible necessary conditions.” Obviously, the properties missing if the effect is present cannot be necessary conditions for effect. This method is also generally described in comparative policy as the most diverse conception of the system.

Posted in Uncategorized