Finally, it is possible to compare the service value (the agreed service level) with the current value. Depending on the service, the types of metrics to monitor may include: defining an appropriate baseline. Defining the right metrics is only half the way. To be useful, metrics must be tailored to a reasonable and achievable level of performance. If strong historical measurement data is not available, you should be prepared to check and adjust the parameters later by a predefined process defined in the SLA. The aim should be to fairly integrate best practices and requirements that preserve the service and avoid additional costs. The service levels agreed and actually achieved may be different. In such cases, the (financial) consequences must be contractually defined in the contract. Here there are basically two different approaches: adding a definition and succinct description concepts used to represent services, roles, metrics, scope, parameters, and other contractual details that can be interpreted subjectively in different contexts. This information may also be spread over appropriate sections of this document, instead of cooperating in a single section. When designing service level agreements, the requirements of both the client and the contractor should be taken into account.

So let`s take a closer look at the interests of these parties. Ideally, SLAs should be tailored to the technology or business goals of the engagement. Misthewriting can have a negative impact on agreement pricing, service quality, and customer experience. Choose measures that motivate good behavior. The first objective of each metric is to motivate the appropriate behavior on behalf of the customer and the service provider. Each part of the relationship will strive to optimize its actions to achieve the performance goals set by the metrics. Focus first on the behavior you want to motivate. Then test your metrics by placing yourself on the other side instead.

How would you optimize your performance? Does this optimization support the initially desired results? Add the pricing models for each type of service with detailed specifications. Let`s take an example to illustrate the above points. For example, if a provider provides first-level support for a contractor, the central criterion in the SLA is the malfunction message. In this regard, it makes sense to work with different priorities. It could be this: in the next section, the contract review should contain four elements: to develop a well-organized service level agreement, there are six key elements that are written into this excellent model and that should be included: make sure that the metrics reflect factors that lie in the control of the supplier. To motivate good behavior, SLA metrics must reflect factors that lie in the control of the extern externator. A typical mistake is to sanction the service provider for delays caused by the customer`s lack of performance. For example, if the customer provides application code change specifications several weeks late, it is unfair and demotivating to keep the service provider on a predetermined delivery date. .

. .